Growing a Team from 3 to 6 Engineers: A Leadership Journey

Scaling an Engineering Team Without Losing Stability

Growing an engineering team from three to six members is not just a question of hiring. In a matrix organization, team growth is about maintaining stability while increasing capacity, ensuring that roles are fulfilled in projects, and enabling teams to operate effectively without adding friction.

When growth is handled well, nothing “breaks.” Instead, the system absorbs new people naturally — and that is often the real sign of good leadership.

Key Points

  1. Team growth is about stability and role clarity, not disruption.
  2. One-on-one and team meetings create the foundation for trust and contribution.
  3. Filling roles early prevents downstream risks in projects.
  4. Delegation and clear ownership enable teams to scale smoothly.
  5. Leadership often evolves quietly as responsibility increases.
A small group of engineers gathered around a table in a modern office, reviewing printed documents together. Laptops and notebooks are visible, and the scene conveys calm collaboration, structure, and focused discussion rather than active problem-solving.

Strategic Alignment and Communication

In a matrix organization, team members are embedded in their respective projects while remaining part of a shared system AIT team. As the team grew, my focus was on ensuring that each engineer clearly understood their role within both contexts — the project and the overarching AIT process.

This clarity helped maintain smooth information flow between design, engineering, and AIT activities, ensuring that projects remained supported as they increased in complexity. Growth, in this case, was less about changing direction and more about strengthening the existing structure.


Creating Space for Contribution

As the team expanded, team meetings became more dynamic. With more perspectives in the room, discussions became richer and knowledge sharing more natural. Engineers could learn from each other’s experiences across different projects, rather than working in isolation.

To support this, I introduced regular biweekly one-on-one meetings. These sessions are less about control and more about listening — understanding where support is needed, who should be connected to whom, and where individual challenges might impact project delivery.

Much of this work is quiet and often invisible, but it is essential housekeeping that keeps the system functioning smoothly.


Delegation and Centralization as the Team Scales

With growth, it became necessary to delegate operational responsibilities more clearly. Certain tasks — such as introducing new tools or supporting process adoption — were delegated to team members, allowing ownership to develop naturally.

At the same time, some responsibilities were intentionally centralized. The interface for AIT processes, work instructions, templates, playbooks, and tools was consolidated into a dedicated role. This created a single point of coordination for the team, ensuring consistency across projects while reducing overhead for individual engineers.

This balance between delegation and centralization helped the team scale without creating confusion or duplication.


Supporting Projects Through Capacity, Not Heroics

One of the most important outcomes of team growth is risk reduction. When key roles are unfilled, projects are forced to compensate — often by stretching people beyond their expertise. By growing the team deliberately, we ensured that projects had the necessary system AIT support in place, reducing the likelihood of delays or avoidable issues later on.

Growth, in this sense, is preventative. It creates resilience rather than reacting to problems after they occur.


The Evolution of Leadership

As the team grew, my leadership did not change dramatically — and that was intentional. The principles remained the same: clarity, availability, and trust. What changed was the scope. More people meant more coordination, more listening, and more attention to how the system as a whole was functioning.

Leadership at this stage is less about intervention and more about ensuring that the right structures are in place so the team can operate effectively on its own.


Reflecting on Growth

How does your leadership enable growth without disruption?
What structures help your team scale while maintaining clarity and stability?

Growing a team does not always require dramatic change. Sometimes, the most effective leadership work is ensuring that growth feels seamless — for the team, the projects, and the organization as a whole.


Leave a comment